Andrew Baker -- Dartmouth
Use the back button on your browser to return to the pref entry page or tournament entry list. The judge philosophy appears in a different format at the bottom of the page.
Judging philosophy:
I debated for The University of Texas at Dallas for four years and am in my first year coaching at Dartmouth. Arguments are "good" or "bad" relative only to their answers. There is no vacuum in which we can place evidence to determine its persuasive value. Often times I find myself persuaded by a well executed strategy over the substantive issues raised by that strategy because a team, sometimes caught up on a singular issue they feel they are "objectively right about," has not fully disputed the truth value of their opponents arguments. This is not to say something such as "anything is an argument" or "offense always beats defense," just that arguments only go as far as they're allowed to. If you think an argument is objectively bad, it shouldn't be hard for you to explain to me why I shouldn't be persuaded by it. Example: if an academically well thought out and defended aff never fully responds to a negative teams well presented argument that breakfast is the most important meal of the day and should shape how I vote, I will be ordering two eggs (scrambled), toast, and a pile of bacon without blinking. Other stuff: Conditionality - usually comes down to the functions of arguments before the number of them. In all honesty, if the neg puts some time into defending it they can usually get away with a lot; but, there is a line and some teams are better than others on telling me when and where to draw it. Topicality - cards cards cards, I need them to figure out what you're trying to tell me the topic should look like. Paperless - everybody's learning, lets just try to be quick and courteous about it The aff should take more risks in strategy - if you kick your aff to capitalize on an error made by the neg or something I'm not going to automatically assume it was a hail marry
Seasonal voting record:
Judge Philosophy Alternate Format: